Baseline Comparison: Compare data across different periods and rigs

From Data to Decisions: Comparing Asset Performance with Greenpact Live

Comparing asset performance is one of the most effective ways to uncover inefficiencies, track improvements, and make informed decisions. That’s why Greenpact Live’s Baseline Comparison feature is designed to give users the flexibility to compare what matters—whether it’s across rigs, time periods, or against performance targets.

This feature isn’t just about viewing data—it’s about putting performance into perspective.

What Can You Compare?

Greenpact Live allows users to define baselines in several ways, depending on what they want to evaluate:

• Same rig, different time period
  Useful for tracking changes over time or evaluating the impact of operational adjustments.
• Different rig, same time period
  Ideal for benchmarking performance across assets in the fleet.
• Different rig, different time period
  Enables broader comparisons across rigs and operational contexts.
• Static target baseline
  Helps monitor progress toward predefined goals or standards.

This flexibility ensures that users can tailor comparisons to their specific needs—whether it's evaluating performance, setting targets, or identifying outliers.

How Is the Comparison Visualized?

Greenpact Live organizes comparison data into five key modules:

• Periodic Overview – High-level summary of total energy consumption and emissions.
• Drilling Activities – Breakdown of consumption by specific operational activities.
• Equipment Categories – Detailed view of energy use by equipment type.
• Power Management – Engine performance metrics such as SFOC, average load, and number of engines online.
• Analytics – Highlights potential savings based on differences between the asset and its baseline.

Example: Lighting Category Comparison

Let’s look at a practical example using the Equipment comparison module.

In the screenshot below, we compare lighting energy consumption between two rigs operating during the same period. The selected rig consistently consumes more energy on lighting than its baseline rig.

This could prompt further investigation:

• Are lighting systems optimized?
• Are operational conditions different?
• Could scheduling or automation reduce unnecessary usage?

By filtering for the Lighting category and selecting incremental chart type, users can pinpoint when and where excess consumption occurs.

Exploring Engine Efficiency Through Power Management and Analytics

Greenpact Live also helps users explore engine performance across rigs. This is especially useful when assessing whether engines are being run efficiently.

Step 1: Observe in Power Management

In the Power management module, users can compare engine metrics like average load and number of engines online. In the example below, the selected rig appears to be running more engines than its baseline, resulting in lower average engine load.

This comparison may suggest an opportunity to review engine usage strategies—perhaps fewer engines could be used more efficiently during certain operations.

Step 2: Investigate in Analytics

To explore this further, users can switch to the Analytics module. By filtering for the focus area “Too many engines running,” the system estimates the potential fuel savings that could be achieved through more efficient engine management.‍

Together, these modules offer a way to compare performance, identify patterns, and consider possible improvements. While the data doesn’t prescribe a solution, it opens the door for informed discussions and operational adjustments.

Conclusion

Greenpact Live’s Baseline Comparison feature is built for meaningful comparisons. Whether you're evaluating performance across rigs, tracking changes over time, or measuring progress against goals, this feature helps you turn data into insight.

Want to see how this could work for your operations? Reach out to us for a demo or more information, and let’s explore how Greenpact Live can help you compare with purpose—and act with confidence.

‍